Excerpt: December “lock-in season” looks like winning—until January hits like a wall. In this piece, I share the real story behind my Christmas Eve $50M deal, why I woke up on January 3rd unable to get out of bed, and the engineering-style systems that ended my cycle of Q1 burnouts. If you’re experiencing a burnout from sprinting in Q4, this is the moment to debug your calendar before it burns your new year.
December Wins, January Surrenders
Christmas Eve. Champagne. A six-figure bonus. From the outside, triumph. From the inside, empty. Three years in a row, I started January in energy bankruptcy—until I stopped treating year-end like a grit contest and started treating it like a systems problem to tackle Q4 sprint burnout.
Here’s the shift: think of Q4 sprint culture as technical debt. Every “just push harder” decision borrows from January to pay December’s deadline. The interest rate? Your health, your relationships, and eventually your ability to do meaningful work. Avoiding burnout during the Q4 sprint is crucial for maintaining balance.
The Lock-In Trap (And How to Break It)
Buffer Blocks: 2–4 PM daily, untouchable—no meetings, no Slack. This margin prevents December chaos from cascading into January burnout.
2-Week Sprint Cycles: 10 days on, 4 days reset. In each reset, audit, delete, refactor. I cut 11 recurring meetings—reclaimed 8 hours/week.
Energy Debt Log: Track every “yes” to someone else’s urgency. Delete one next week—every week.
Alignment Audit (Fridays @ 4 PM): What recharged me? What drained me? Am I sprinting toward my values—or someone else’s metrics?
These aren’t slogans. They’re stealable systems that turned my Q1 from recovery mode into launch mode, helping me avoid Q4 sprint burnout effectively.
This story includes the full breakdown, the calendar screenshots, and the downloadable Energy Debt Tracker. It’s all packaged on Substack for the cleanest reading + save/forward experience.
Start here: audit your December calendar. For each commitment, ask: “Is this my goal—or someone else’s urgency?” Delete one. Then grab the template in the full post.
Here’s to debugging December before it burns January. 🚀
TL;DR: A new $100K one-time H-1B visa fee is shaking the tech world and is set to cause significant changes in 2025 with potential career impacts. The $100K H-1B fee changes 2025 career impact significantly. – Big Tech will pay → startups can’t. – Immigrants face longer odds and deeper despair. – But the real story isn’t the fee — it’s dependency.
👉 The wake-up call: stop betting your future on bureaucracy. Build portable skills, side income, and global options so your career travels with you — no visa required.
When Raj read the headline at 2 AM, his coffee went cold in his hands. A $100,000 fee for new H-1B visas.
Five years of 80-hour weeks building fintech systems worth millions. Five years of lottery anxiety, checking USCIS updates like stock prices. Now this felt less like immigration policy and more like a ransom note with $100K H-1B fee changes 2025 career impact.
But here’s the twist that changes everything: this isn’t just Raj’s story. It’s the mirror every skilled professional needs to see regarding $100K H-1B fee changes 2025 career impact.
The Numbers That Scream
📊 85,000 new H-1Bs per year
📈 780,884 applications in 2024 (lottery odds: 11%)
⏳ 1.1M+ Indian professionals stuck in green card purgatory (wait times: 20+ years)
💸 $100,000 fee = instant startup killer
Big Tech shrugs. Amazon filed 10,000 visas in 2024 — a billion-dollar tax they’ll gladly pay. Startups? Flatlined due to fee changes, which inevitably shift career landscapes in 2025.
“This isn’t immigration reform. It’s a corporate moat disguised as policy.”
“It’s been good, going to pack my bags and head back home. I don’t think we’re very wanted here.”
— Reddit user
Behind every post is a family calculating whether to uproot their life, relocate to Toronto, or accept decades in visa limbo.
The Mirror Moment No One Wants to Face
Here’s the truth that stings: If your entire career plan depends on a government lottery, you don’t have a plan. You have a bet.
The $100K fee is brutal — but it’s also a signal. A mirror. A question that cuts to the bone:
👉 What part of your career do you actually control?
Because while everyone debates policy, the real issue is dependency. The same brilliant minds building trillion-dollar systems are treating their own careers like lottery tickets amidst the $100K H-1B fee changes in 2025.
The Liberation Playbook (Start Today)
Stop waiting for Washington. Start building your own immigration policy.
🎯 Build Your $10K Monthly Safety Net
Raj started consulting on Upwork during lunch breaks. Three months later, his “side hustle” was pulling $2,400/month. Six months in? It matched his salary. His backup became his breakthrough amidst substantial H-1B fee changes impacting careers in 2025.
🔧 Turn Your Skills Into Portable Assets
Immigration status expires. Code doesn’t.
Package your ML model as a SaaS tool.
Create a course from your architecture expertise.
Offer debugging as a premium service.
🌍 Engineer Your Geographic Arbitrage
Dubai pays $120K tax-free.
Berlin fast-tracks visas in 90 days.
Singapore welcomes tech talent with open arms.
Your skills have global market value — but only if you price them globally.
The Uncomfortable Truth Politicians Won’t Say
Your skills are your real passport.
If you can’t shine in America, you’ll shine in Canada. If not Canada, then Germany. If not Germany, then your own venture. With the $100K H-1B fee changes 2025 career impact, professionals need to rethink options.
The fee isn’t punishment — it’s clarity. Clarity that betting your future on bureaucracy is the riskiest move of all.
What This Means for You Right Now
If you’re on H-1B: This isn’t the end. It’s the beginning of building something no government can revoke amid changes in career dynamics due to the $100K fee.
If you’re a U.S. worker: Don’t celebrate too early. Skilled professionals leaving doesn’t boost wages — it moves entire companies offshore.
If you’re an entrepreneur: Welcome to the biggest talent opportunity in decades.
The Real Question
The real tragedy isn’t the fee — it’s brilliant people betting their futures on bureaucracy. The real liberation? Choosing yourself.
So what is the $100K fee for you? 👉 A tollbooth that stops you in your tracks? 👉 Or the trigger that finally makes you build a career that travels with you — no visa required amidst the implications of H-1B fee changes in 2025?
💬 Reply in the comments: How does this change your next move? 🔄 Share this post with someone navigating the same questions.
Here’s to careers that cross borders without asking permission.
The education system wasn’t designed to make you free. Inspired by the Rockefeller education model and the Prussian industrial system, school programming was built to produce reliable, obedient workers. This school conditioning still shapes high earners today—keeping them in jobs they dislike, trading time for money, and missing out on millions in wealth creation.
But here’s the nuance: it’s not about quitting tomorrow. It’s about recognizing where conditioning serves you—and where it secretly sabotages you.
Rachel’s $250K Programming Problem
Rachel was the model student. Valedictorian. MIT scholarship. Graduated summa cum laude in computer science.
At 32, she’s earning $180K at Google. On paper, she looks set. But she told me over Zoom:
“I followed every rule, checked every box… and I’m still one medical bill away from panic.”
Her struggle isn’t unique:
High Bay Area rent
Student loans
Lifestyle creep from “finally making it”
She isn’t “broke” because she’s irresponsible—she’s trapped because her school conditioning keeps her optimizing for safety inside a system that demands more than it gives.
The Industrial Education Blueprint: How School Conditioning Began
In the late 1800s, John D. Rockefeller and other industrialists bankrolled the modern U.S. school model. Not to inspire free thinkers—but to mass-produce a disciplined workforce.
The Prussian-inspired system emphasized:
Uniforms → conformity over individuality
Bells & strict schedules → preparation for factory shifts
Standardized testing → quality control for human “products”
That structure worked so well that 150 years later, “good student” programming still governs our adult choices: seek permission, avoid risk, optimize for credentials.
The Modern Conditioning Tax: How School Conditioning Caps Wealth
Here’s what it looks like in practice:
Seek external validation → staying in “safe” jobs instead of testing the market
Avoid failure at all costs → never taking calculated risks with asymmetric upside
Follow the prescribed path → deferring dreams while waiting for the “right time”
Optimize for grades/titles → chasing credentials instead of outcomes
Wait for authority → decades of salary raises instead of equity
Rachel’s $180K is solid. But market data tells a different story about her earning potential.
📊 According to Upwork’s 2024 Tech Services Rate Report, U.S.-based cloud engineers and DevOps consultants typically charge $125–$200/hr, with senior specialists frequently commanding $225/hr+.
Even at the conservative end, 20 billable hours per week = $130K–$200K annually on the side—before touching her full-time salary.
Her conditioning isn’t letting her try.
💡 Mirror moment:Where are you still waiting for permission?
Marcus’s Liberation Story (With the Missing Details)
Marcus, Rachel’s classmate, took a different path. When the ceiling hit at his FAANG job, he didn’t polish his résumé—he shipped a buggy AI-powered code review tool in two weeks.
Version 1: flopped
Version 2: failed too
Version 3: got traction
Over 18 months, he sold it for $1.2M. Now he runs micro-SaaS tools generating $40K/month.
Here’s the part you don’t see on Instagram:
He had 12 months of savings as a runway
He freelanced part-time to cover healthcare and bills
He had two previous side projects that went nowhere
Marcus didn’t succeed because he “rebelled against school conditioning.” He succeeded because he blended discipline (shaped by school conditioning) with courage to act outside the script.
Why This Crisis Demands Your Attention Now
The Federal Reserve recently reported that only 44.9% of Americans feel confident they could find new work if they lost their current job.
Among high earners, the issue isn’t income—it’s dependency.
School taught us:
Safety = success
Credentials = worth
Authority = direction
But in today’s volatile economy, that conditioning silently taxes you six figures in lost opportunities.
The BREAK Framework: Deprogramming School Conditioning
B – Become Aware: Catch yourself when you default to “what will they think?”
R – Reject Safe Defaults: Ask: is this choice based on safety… or growth?
E – Experiment Small: Run low-risk tests: side gigs, pilot projects, consulting trials.
A – Act Without Authority: Stop waiting for managers or institutions to greenlight your ideas.
K – Keep Learning Post-Action: Reflect and iterate. Action first, refinement second.
The 30-Day Deprogramming Sprint (Realistic Edition)
Week 1: Audit Your Conditioning
List 3 financial decisions you delayed because they felt “unsafe”
Identify one side project you’ve shelved out of fear
Week 2: Permission-Free Test
Launch one micro-experiment (newsletter, product mockup, freelance gig)
Keep it under 10 hours + $200 cost
Week 3: Risk Reframe
Take one calculated risk (pitching a client, publishing publicly)
Document lessons learned, not just outcomes
Week 4: Ownership Step
Package one repeatable process you control (template, script, tool)
Share or sell it to test market demand
Reality Check: The Transition Trap
This isn’t a call to quit your job tomorrow. Health insurance, family needs, capital requirements—these are real.
But conditioning keeps you treating these barriers as permanent walls instead of hurdles you can plan around.
The real trap isn’t risk. It’s assuming obedience is safe when safety is already eroding.
The Fork in the Road: Two Futures, One Choice
Rachel is still waiting for her next promotion. Marcus is building assets that pay him whether he works or not.
School trained you to be a good student. Wealth requires learning to be a good owner.
Your conditioning isn’t your fault, but your deprogramming is your responsibility.
Standing still feels safe because school taught you that following rules equals success. But in a world where entire industries can disappear overnight, the riskiest thing you can do is nothing.
👉 What would you build if you stopped asking for permission and started taking action?
Your Next Move
Download my Deprogramming Playbook—the complete framework for breaking school conditioning, with a 30-day sprint that balances realistic safety nets and ownership experiments.
TL;DR: Everyone’s chasing AI certifications to “secure” their jobs, especially in consulting AI careers. But the real threat isn’t a lack of skills—it’s that the entire employment model is collapsing. Yes, AI roles appear to pay more, but the same tools are automating entire job categories. Here’s what career coaches won’t tell you, why upskilling can be a trap, and the only strategy that actually works.
What you’ll learn: Why the AI skills arms race can be participation in your own elimination, how to use AI for ownership instead of employment, and the framework that turns automation from threat to advantage.
Diego’s $18K Wake-Up Call
Diego was a solid DevOps engineer at a Fortune 500 bank. Ten years of experience. $90K salary. Stable role.
Until last quarter, when his manager hired a contractor who automated 40% of Diego’s workload with Python scripts and a ChatGPT API. The contractor billed $180/hr. Diego made $43/hr.
“I’ve been doing this for 10 years. How did I get leapfrogged in three weeks?”
Diego, after restructuring
Not because Diego wasn’t good—because he wasn’t current. His response? Enroll in an $18K “AI Executive Certificate”. Same mistake thousands are making: trying to skill their way out of a system that’s eliminating roles faster than courses can launch.
The AI Premium Mirage: When Data Becomes Dangerous
More AI jobs. Fewer human jobs.
AI/ML roles pay “~28% more” (historical snapshot, not a guarantee)
Multiple AI skills ≈ 43% higher salaries (correlation, not causation)
AI mentions in job posts up ~800% since 2022 (supply flooding in)
The part the headlines miss: automation moves faster than salary surveys. Those premiums largely reflect 2022–2023 scarcity. Today, tens of thousands of U.S. roles require generative AI—and the premium compresses as supply surges. Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of tech jobs vanished, many automated, not offshored.
Brutal truth: By the time data shows an “AI premium,” automation for that role is already underway.
💡 Mirror moment: If 40% of your workload vanished tomorrow, would you own anything that still pays you?
Why This Crisis Demands Your Attention Now
AI screens out up to 95% of candidates before a human looks.
“Ghost jobs” clutter boards with roles that won’t be filled.
Automation erases departments faster than new ones appear.
The “AI premium” is becoming an AI commodity.
If you’re banking on certificates to secure a position, you may be optimizing for a game that’s ending.
Aisha’s Plot Twist: From Employee to Owner
Three months after Diego was cut, I met Aisha—same DevOps background, same industry. When her company announced “AI efficiency initiatives,” she didn’t enroll in another program. She built something: an AI-powered config-drift detection system that predicts infrastructure failures 72 hours in advance.
“The moment I stopped trying to save my job and started solving my own problem, everything changed.”
Aisha
Her pilot saved one client ~$500K in downtime. Six months later, she’s running a ~$200K consulting practice with three enterprise clients. Same skills as Diego. Different model. Different outcome.
Saturation: “AI consultant” is the new “web developer (2010).” Niche or be noisy.
Winners don’t just learn AI. They learn business.
The OATS Framework: AI for Ownership, Not Employment
O — Own the Output Don’t just use AI tools. Build AI-powered systems you control. Products, not just productivity.
A — Automate the Mundane Let AI handle repeatable tasks while you focus on judgment, relationships, and strategy.
T — Think Systems, Not Skills Processes that scale without you beat personal efficiency at tasks that will be automated.
S — Scale Through Others Leverage AI to multiply impact and serve more clients—don’t just grind out tasks faster.
The 30-Day AI Ownership Sprint
Week 1 — Build, Don’t Just Learn
Take one AI course; immediately automate something you own.
Create one micro-product (report, diagnostic, process optimizer).
Document time/cost saved—this becomes your value story.
Week 2 — Integrate & Measure
Use AI for coding (Copilot), analysis (Claude), design (Figma AI).
Track hours saved and quality gains.
Position around outcomes, not tools.
Week 3 — Specialize for Ownership
Pick one profitable niche (compliance audits, workflow optimization, custom automation).
Research demand; build case studies from Weeks 1–2.
Week 4 — Package & Position
Create one consultative offering with clear outcomes and timeline.
Practice the business case for non-technical leaders.
Test with warm contacts; refine based on objections.
Copy-Paste Scripts (Steal These)
Discovery DM Hi [Name] — I’m building AI-driven solutions for [specific problem]. Based on our work at [Company], I suspect you’re seeing similar challenges with [pain point]. Mind if I share a 2-minute overview of how others are approaching this?
Value Positioning I help [target] reduce [cost/time/risk] by [X%] using AI-powered [solution]. Example: [specific metric] improvement for [similar company] in [timeframe].
Rate Pushback I price on impact, not hours. With my AI-enhanced workflow, clients typically see [outcome] in [timeframe]. Most invest [range] because ROI is [multiple] within the first quarter.
The Fork in the Road
Upskilling is not insurance. It can be participation in your own elimination. Your skills won’t save you. Your ownership will.
Standing still isn’t safe anymore. But chasing skills without changing models? That’s just sophisticated participation in your own elimination. What are you building that survives the automation of everything else?
Your Next Move
Download: The AI Ownership Playbook — the complete 30-day sprint, positioning scripts, and client acquisition framework that turns AI skills into assets, not résumé fluff.
Reply “AI OWNERSHIP” or contact me to get it delivered.
TL;DR: If you spend more than 15 hours/week in meetings, you’re not collaborating — you’re funding a culture that steals your deep work (and $25K–$40K/year of your career value). To boost your efficiency and avoid meeting productivity pitfalls, here’s the math, the scripts, and a 30-day fix.
Marcus’s Wake-Up Call
“Still here. Hour two. We’re planning the agenda for next week’s pre-meeting. I want to scream.”
Marcus, Senior Software Architect
Marcus isn’t lazy. He’s a senior software architect at a Fortune 500 company — the kind of engineer who can debug a distributed system in his sleep. But instead of solving problems, he spends nearly half his week in meetings that feel more like corporate theater than collaboration.
The meeting that finally broke him? A “sprint retrospective planning session” where they spent 90 minutes discussing why retrospectives weren’t working. Meanwhile, his pull request sat for three days waiting for an architect who was “thinking about the implications.”
He isn’t alone. We’re living through a meeting epidemic — and it’s quietly killing careers.
The Old World vs. Today
Then: In the 1960s, executives averaged ~10 hours/week in meetings. They were rare, decisive, and run by people with authority.
Now: We hold meetings to plan other meetings:
“Alignment syncs”
“Retro on the retro”
“Scoping sessions to prep the scoping session”
It’s professional Groundhog Day — and most of us are Bill Murray. Executives now average ~23 hours/week in meetings, with roughly half producing zero outcomes. That adds up to an estimated $37B in wasted time annually in the U.S. alone. The hidden cost isn’t just productivity. It’s potential.
The Corporate Theater Starter Pack
Sprint planning meetings to plan the sprint planning
Architecture reviews where no architects decide
“Discovery sessions” to scope the scoping session
Daily standups that run 45 minutes
Dependency mapping workshops that create more dependencies
Post-mortems about why the post-mortem isn’t working
Each one appears productive while actually hindering progress.
Mirror moment: How many hours last week did you spend in these — and how many actually moved work forward?
When Tech Titans Said “Enough”
Jeff Bezos: No PowerPoints. Every meeting begins with 30 minutes of silent memo-reading.
Steve Jobs: Removed attendees who couldn’t justify their presence.
Elon Musk: “No large meetings. If you’re not adding value, leave.”
Mark Cuban: “Nobody likes meetings except the people who bring the donuts.”
These weren’t quirks. They were defenses against the scarcest resource they had: time for deep work.
Watching Genius Get Buried Alive
Jennifer, a brilliant ML engineer, proposed a fraud detection algorithm projected to save $2M annually. Seven meetings later, the idea was buried in a “working group.” Six months later, a fintech launched the same solution and sold it for $50M. Jennifer left two weeks later — now charging $300/hr to implement the same algorithm. No committees required.
Innovation doesn’t die in code. It dies in conference rooms.
My $42,000 Awakening
18 hours in meetings
12 hours of real engineering
The rest: context switching & recovery
The breaking point? A 90-minute “deployment pipeline improvement session.” Everyone knew the problems and the solutions — yet we scheduled three follow-ups instead of implementing anything. I was being paid $90/hour to catalog known problems while solutions gathered dust.
Annual cost: $42,000 wasted. 20-year cost: ~$1.4M in lost wealth. That’s a rental property down payment, an emergency fund — financial freedom — stolen by meetings.
What I’ve Learned Coaching 200+ Engineers
Average load: Senior ICs spend 16–22 hours/week in meetings.
Efficiency scores: 89% score below 2.0 on the first assessment.
Top time wasters: Sprint ceremonies (31%), architecture reviews (24%), status updates (19%).
Quick wins: Async standups save 3–4 hours/week immediately.
Most resistance: Managers fear “reduced collaboration” — yet throughput improves when meetings shrink.
Calculate Your Meeting Tax (Prepare to Be Angry)
Step 1 — % of year in meetings:Hours/week × 52 ÷ 2,080
Copy-paste script: “Thanks for including me. Based on the agenda, this looks like product strategy, not technical architecture. Could you share outcomes and tag me if constraints emerge?”
Your Move (Career Audit)
If your Meeting Tax > $25K annually, that’s not a productivity problem — that’s a career emergency. Reply with your meeting tax % and role (IC/Manager). If it’s over $30K, I’ll send my 30-Day Calendar Reboot Playbook — templates, pre-reads, and team experiments. No charge.
Your calendar is your career trajectory. Every invite is a vote. This week: will you keep funding busywork — or start investing in your freedom?
Sarah made $165K at Meta. Stock options. Corner office. Everyone envied her success, which stemmed from her expertise in consulting corporate jobs within the consulting sector.
She also cried in her car every morning before work.
“What’s wrong with me?” she asked during our first coaching call. “I have everything people want, but I feel completely trapped.”
Here’s what I discovered: Sarah wasn’t broken. She was being systematically extracted.
Every brilliant idea she had became Meta’s intellectual property. Every relationship she built served the business development. Every skill she developed made her more competitive, but also more dependent.
Sarah was generating $230K in annual value but only receiving $165K. The difference? $65K in corporate extraction.
And she’s not alone.
Most high earners try to solve this feeling by asking for raises, seeking promotions, or improving work-life balance. But these are band-aids on a deeper wound.
The real problem isn’t your performance. It’s that you’re trapped in an extraction economy designed to harvest your value.
The Workplace Genie
Think about it:
Your brilliance becomes their competitive edge.
Your network becomes their leverage.
Your reputation builds their brand.
Your expertise builds their market position.
Meanwhile, you feel increasingly hollow despite external success.
The average professional in my assessment discovers they’re losing $45K-$67K annually to extraction patterns. That’s why raises never feel like enough — you’re creating far more value than you’re capturing.
Here’s what I do differently:
Instead of optimizing within broken systems, I help people build systematic escape routes. Not by quitting tomorrow, but by creating options so you stay by choice rather than necessity.
Sarah now runs a $180K consulting practice, working 25 hours per week from anywhere she wants—same skills, zero extraction, complete freedom.
Your next move:
Take the Corporate Liberation Assessment this week. It reveals exactly where your value is being captured and shows you the systematic path to freedom.
Sarah made $165K at Meta. Stock options. Corner office. Everyone envied her success.
She also cried in her car every morning before work.
“What’s wrong with me?” she asked during our first coaching call. “I have everything people want, but I feel completely trapped.”
Here’s what I discovered: Sarah wasn’t broken. She was being systematically extracted.
Every brilliant idea she had became Meta’s intellectual property. Every relationship she built served their business development. Every skill she developed made her more competitive, but also more dependent.
Sarah was generating $230K in annual value but only receiving $165K. The difference? $65K in corporate extraction.
And she’s not alone.
Most high-earners try to solve this feeling by asking for raises, seeking promotions, or improving work-life balance. But these are band-aids on a deeper wound.
The real problem isn’t your performance. It’s that you’re trapped in an extraction economy designed to harvest your value.
Think about it:
Your brilliance becomes their competitive edge.
Your network becomes their leverage.
Your reputation builds their brand.
Your expertise builds their market position
Meanwhile, you feel increasingly hollow despite external success.
The average professional in my assessment discovers they’re losing $45K-$67K annually to extraction patterns. That’s why raises never feel like enough — you’re creating far more value than you’re capturing.
Here’s what I do differently:
Instead of optimizing within broken systems, I help people build systematic escape routes. Not by quitting tomorrow, but by creating options so you stay by choice rather than necessity.
Sarah now runs a $180K consulting practice, working 25 hours per week from anywhere she wants. Same skills, zero extraction, complete freedom.
Your next move:
Take the Corporate Liberation Assessment this week. It reveals exactly where your value is being captured and shows you the systematic path to freedom.
When Thomas Dohmke announced he was stepping down as CEO of GitHub to become a founder again, the tech world barely blinked. Just another executive transition in a sea of corporate reshuffling, right?
Wrong.
Dohmke’s departure is part of a seismic shift that’s reshaping how we think about career success, corporate loyalty, and professional freedom. CEO turnover, often termed an executive exodus, hit record highs in 2025, with voluntary departures up 34% from the previous year. But here’s what makes this trend fascinating: these aren’t failures or firings. These are strategic exits by people who could coast at the top forever.
The Numbers Don’t Lie
Average CEO tenure has dropped to 3.2 years — the lowest since 2008
67% of departing CEOs started their own ventures within six months
Exit packages averaging $12+ million, yet they’re still walking away
Most cited reason? “Misalignment with corporate direction” — not pay
When people with generational wealth choose uncertainty over security, that’s not a career decision. That’s a cultural signal highlighted by the current trend of executive exodus.
Beyond the C-Suite: The Extraction Economy
This isn’t just about executives. What I call the “extraction economy”—where organizations systematically harvest employee value beyond traditional labor—has reached a breaking point.
In my coaching practice, I hear it every week:
FAANG engineers earning $180K+ but feeling unfulfilled
Marketing leads drained by never-ending meetings
Consultants delivering results while quietly burning out
The Three Types of Corporate Extraction
After working with 200+ professionals seeking career liberation, I’ve identified three core patterns:
1. Intellectual Extraction
Your best ideas become company IP. Your strategic thinking strengthens their market position—while your personal vision atrophies.
“I became the world’s best expert at solving problems I didn’t care about.” — Sarah, former Netflix engineer
2. Social Extraction
Your network becomes their business pipeline. Your reputation props up their brand, until you forget where your name ends and theirs begins.
“When I left, I didn’t know who I was without the logo.” — Former Apple director
3. Temporal Extraction
Your bandwidth gets chewed up in off-hour Slack messages, urgent weekend projects, and training that only grows company-specific skills, contributing to an executive exodus.
The Competence Trap
Paradoxically, the better you get, the more trapped you become. Excellence creates dependency. Dependency leads to burnout.
“I wasn’t just good at my job—I was trapped by being too good at it.” — Mark, former Amazon engineer
The Bureaucracy Tax
Every meeting you attend teaches you to seek permission. Every alignment call delays action. The bureaucracy tax isn’t inefficiency—it’s creativity theft.
“I realized I was getting promoted away from the work I actually loved.” — Former Google director
The Freedom Alternative
Recognition: Spot how and where you’re being extracted.
Skill Diversification: Build portable expertise.
Parallel Value Creation: Develop income streams outside your job.
Strategic Transition: Leave from strength, not survival, minimizing your risk of falling into an executive exodus trap.
The New Career Architecture
The ladder is broken. The new model is about autonomy architecture — portable skills, multiple income streams, reputation-first work. This paradigm shift underscores the executive exodus trend.
What This Means for You
This CEO exodus is part of the broader executive exodus and serves as a preview of the workforce of the future. It’s not a fluke—it’s a flag. If you’re feeling stuck, you’re not broken. You’re just in the wrong system.
Ready to begin your strategic exit? Take the Corporate Liberation Assessment to identify your extraction patterns and start building your Freedom Framework.
Why GitHub’s CEO Just Walked Away (and What It Means for You)
From CEO to Founder: The Escape That No One Saw Coming
Hey Reader, Did you hear the news? The CEO of GitHub — yes, the $9.5 billion platform used by 100 million developers — surprised everyone. He quit. Voluntarily.
No scandal. No drama. Just a simple message:
“I want to build something again.”
But here’s the more profound truth most headlines missed: Thomas Dohmke didn’t just leave a job — he escaped a system.
Even at the top, even with power and prestige, the extraction doesn’t stop.
Every insight becomes company property.
Every connection gets monetized.
Every hour of genius props up someone else’s empire.
It’s not just about tech CEOs. It’s about any of us who’ve ever felt like our success is being siphoned into someone else’s machine.
I break down what career extraction looks like — and how to build your escape path, even if you’re not a CEO. If you’ve ever wondered whether “more success” is the answer, I think you’ll find this helpful.
When Thomas Dohmke announced he was stepping down as CEO of GitHub, most headlines called it “surprising.”
After all, who walks away from running a $9.5 billion platform that powers 100 million developers?
But if you understand career extraction—the quiet, systematic harvesting of a professional’s creative and emotional energy—his move starts to make perfect sense.
What Is Career Extraction?
Career extraction happens when your value at work goes far beyond your job title or salary—yet most of that value is captured by someone else.
🧠 Your best ideas become intellectual property for the company.
🤝 Your network becomes a pipeline for others’ success.
🎙️ Your voice and presence build the brand—just not your own.
It’s not just burnout. It’s identity outsourcing. And it hits hardest the higher you climb.
GitHub’s CEO Wasn’t Just Managing—He Was Being Mined
As GitHub’s CEO under Microsoft, Dohmke’s influence extended far beyond software leadership. He became a strategic resource, a public figure, and a symbolic extension of the parent company.
💡 His strategic thinking shaped Microsoft’s future, not his own.
🌐 His global relationships fed the corporate engine.
📸 Every photo op, keynote, and interview enhanced Microsoft’s brand, not “Thomas the Founder.”
That’s executive-level career extraction: when your title grows, but your freedom shrinks.
The Turning Point: From Optimization to Escape
Dohmke realized what many high-performers feel but rarely name:
There comes a point where optimizing your role inside the system feels less valuable than building your escape route from it.
Leaving wasn’t failure. It was clarity. It was power. It was freedom.
And that’s what I help my coaching clients uncover every day—whether they’re mid-level managers or C-suite leaders. Escaping career extraction isn’t about burning bridges. It’s about finally crossing the one that leads back to yourself.
Your Call
If you’ve ever looked around and thought, “This success doesn’t feel like mine anymore,” you’re not alone. Subscribe to my newsletter for real talk, mindset shifts, and career clarity—straight from The Workplace Genie.
